Conservation Status
Occurrence records map (0 records)
Datasets
datasets have provided data to the Atlas of Living Australia for this species.
Browse the list of datasets and find organisations you can join if you are interested in participating in a survey for species like Hovea linearis ( )
Types
Specimens
Images
Misidentified

Names and sources
Accepted Name | Source |
---|---|
Hovea linearis ( ) | |
According to:CHAH (2011), Australian Plant Census | |
Published in:Aiton, W.T. (1812), Hortus Kewensis Edn. 2, 4 | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
Synonym | Source |
---|---|
Phusicarpos linearis ( ) homotypic | |
Published in:Poiret, J.L.M. in Lamarck, J.-B.P.A. de M. de & Poiret, J.L.M. (1816), Encyclopédie Méthodique, Botanique Suppl. 4(2) | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
|
Hovea heterophylla ex pro-parte | |
Published in:Hooker, J.D. (1855), The botany of the Antarctic voyage of H.M. Discovery ships Erebus and Terror. III. Flora Tasmaniae 1(1) | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
|
Poiretia linearis homotypic | |
Published in:Smith, J.E (1808), Characters of Platylobium, Bossiaea and of a new Genus named Poiretia. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 9 | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
|
Hovea heterophylla f. decipiens pro-parte | |
Published in:Domin, K. (1926), Beitrage zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens. Bibliotheca Botanica 22(89) | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
Name | Source |
---|---|
Hovea linearis inferred accepted | |
Unranked taxon assigned rank species by inference Scientific name reallocated to Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br. by taxonomy builder |
|
Hovea linearis ( ) accepted | |
Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published. |
Identifier | Source |
---|---|
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2899504 Taxon current | |
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/instance/apni/727267 Taxon Concept current | |
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/apni/69613 Scientific Name current | |
ALA_Hovea_linearis Taxon current | |
http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2899504 URI unknown |
Classification
- kingdom
- Plantae
- phylum
- Charophyta
- class
- Equisetopsida
- subclass
- Magnoliidae
Charts showing breakdown of occurrence records (0 records)
Name references found in the Biodiversity Heritage Library
Genbank
Data sets | Licence | Records |
---|