Occurrence records map (0 records)

Datasets

datasets have provided data to the Atlas of Living Australia for this species.

Browse the list of datasets and find organisations you can join if you are interested in participating in a survey for species like Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br.

Names and sources

Accepted Name Source
Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br.
According to:CHAH (2011), Australian Plant Census
Published in:Aiton, W.T. (1812), Hortus Kewensis Edn. 2, 4

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Synonym Source
Phusicarpos linearis (Sm.) Poir. homotypic
Published in:Poiret, J.L.M. in Lamarck, J.-B.P.A. de M. de & Poiret, J.L.M. (1816), Encyclopédie Méthodique, Botanique Suppl. 4(2)

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Hovea heterophylla A.Cunn. ex Hook.f. pro-parte
Published in:Hooker, J.D. (1855), The botany of the Antarctic voyage of H.M. Discovery ships Erebus and Terror. III. Flora Tasmaniae 1(1)

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Poiretia linearis Sm. homotypic
Published in:Smith, J.E (1808), Characters of Platylobium, Bossiaea and of a new Genus named Poiretia. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 9

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Hovea heterophylla f. decipiens Domin pro-parte
Published in:Domin, K. (1926), Beitrage zur Flora und Pflanzengeographie Australiens. Bibliotheca Botanica 22(89)

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Name Source
Hovea linearis inferred accepted

Unranked taxon assigned rank species by inference

Scientific name reallocated to Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br. by taxonomy builder

Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br. accepted

Some authors (e.g. J.H.Ross, Muelleria 9: 15 (1996), I.R.Thompson, Austral. Syst. Bot. 14: 44 (2001)), list the name Poiretia linearis Sm. as illegitimate. However, the name is legitimate under Art. 55.1 of the ICBN (Vienna Code (2006)). A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2249 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Phusicarpos linearis. However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published.

Identifier Source
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2899504 Taxon current
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/instance/apni/727267 Taxon Concept current
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/apni/69613 Scientific Name current
ALA_Hovea_linearis Taxon current
http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2899504 URI unknown

Classification

kingdom
Plantae
phylum
Charophyta
class
Equisetopsida
subclass
Magnoliidae
superorder
Rosanae
order
Fabales
family
Fabaceae
genus
Hovea
species
Hovea linearis
species
Hovea linearis (Sm.) R.Br. x Hovea heterophylla A.Cunn. ex Hook.f. 

Charts showing breakdown of occurrence records (0 records)

Name references found in the Biodiversity Heritage Library


Name references found in Trove

Genbank

Data sets Licence Records