Occurrence records map (0 records)

Datasets

datasets have provided data to the Atlas of Living Australia for this species.

Browse the list of datasets and find organisations you can join if you are interested in participating in a survey for species like Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir.

Names and sources

Accepted Name Source
Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir.
According to:CHAH (2012), Australian Plant Census
Published in:Poiret, J.L.M. in Lamarck, J.-B.P.A. de M. de & Poiret, J.L.M. (1811), Encyclopédie Méthodique, Botanique Suppl. 2(1)

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Synonym Source
Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir. var. nitens homotypic
Published in:Ewart, A.J. & White, J. (1910), Contributions to the flora of Australia, No. 13. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria Ser. 2, 22(2)

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Scirpus nitens (R.Br.) Boeckeler homotypic
Published in:Boeckeler, J.O. (1870), Die Cyperaceen des Koeniglichen Herbariums zu Berlin (cont.). Linnaea: ein Journal für die Botanik in ihrem ganzen Umfange, oder Beiträge zur Pflanzenkunde 36(6)

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Chaetospora nitens R.Br. homotypic
Published in:Brown, R. (1810), Prodromus florae Novae Hollandiae et insulae Van-Diemen, exhibens characteres plantarum quas annis 1802-1805

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Schoenus nitens var. major Ewart & Jean White heterotypic
Published in:Ewart, A.J. & White, J. (1910), Contributions to the flora of Australia, No. 13. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria Ser. 2, 22(2)

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Common Name Source
Shiny Bog-Rush Australia
Shiny Bogrush Australia
Name Source
Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Roem. & Schult. accepted

Taxon concept reallocated to Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir. by taxonomy builder to resolve authorship clash

Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir. accepted

A.D.Chapman, Austral. Pl. Name Index 2595 (1991) stated that Poiret did not validly make the combination Schoenus nitens and indicated that the combination was validly made by Roemer & Schultes (Syst. Veg. 16th edn, 2: 77 (1817)). However, under Article 33.1 of the 2006 (Vienna) edition of the ICBN, this name is considered to be validly published by Poiret and Roemer & Schultes' use of this name is considered to be a secondary reference.

Schoenus nitens inferred accepted

Unranked taxon assigned rank species by inference

Scientific name reallocated to Schoenus nitens (R.Br.) Poir. by taxonomy builder

Identifier Source
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/name/apni/111626 Scientific Name current
NZOR-6-42098 Taxon current
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/instance/apni/769983 Taxon Concept current
http://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2903774 URI unknown
https://id.biodiversity.org.au/node/apni/2903774 Taxon current
http://data.nzor.org.nz/names/ec2649ab-3ba6-4f26-8d8c-cf4ed2acd29d Scientific Name current
ALA_Schoenus_nitens Taxon current

Classification

kingdom
Plantae
phylum
Charophyta
class
Equisetopsida
subclass
Magnoliidae
superorder
Lilianae
order
Poales
family
Cyperaceae
genus
Schoenus
species
Schoenus nitens
variety
Schoenus nitens var. concinnus (Hook.f.) Cheeseman 

Charts showing breakdown of occurrence records (0 records)

Name references found in the Biodiversity Heritage Library


Name references found in Trove

Genbank

Data sets Licence Records